Prosecute Iraqs Chemical
Ali
Saddam Hussein Aide Accused of Atrocities
Against Kurds More
News
- DRC: One killed, five wounded as Red
Cross vehicle is ambushed
IRAQ: U.S. Says Decision Imminent; Baghdad
Offers Concessions;
Prosecute Iraqs Chemical Ali
Saddam Hussein Aide Accused of
Atrocities Against Kurds
(New York, January 17, 2003) -- Human Rights
Watch called today for the
immediate arrest and prosecution of Iraqi General Ali Hassan
al-Majid,
the architect of the 1988 genocidal Anfal campaign
against the Iraqi
Kurds, who is currently traveling through the Middle East.
General al-Majid arrived in Damascus, Syria,
today for talks with
President Bashar al-Assad, reportedly as part of efforts to avert
a
possible war against Iraq. According to press reports, he may
also
visit Egypt, Jordan and Lebanon in the coming days.
Al-Majid commanded Iraqs notorious Anfal
campaign, which resulted in
the murder and disappearance of some 100,000 Kurds
and was marked by
the use of chemical weapons, according to a Human Rights Watch
book on
that campaign, Genocide In Iraq: The Anfal Campaign Against the
Kurds
(http://www.hrw.org/reports/1993/iraqanfal/). Al-Majid is widely
known
in Iraq as Chemical Ali for his repeated use of outlawed
chemical
warfare. He was later in charge of Iraqs brutal military
occupation of
Kuwait. "Al-Majid is Saddam Hussein's hatchet man. He has
been involved in some of Iraq's worst crimes -- including genocide
and crimes against
humanity," said Kenneth Roth, executive director of Human
Rights Watch.
"Bringing him to justice is an essential priority.
Who is Ali Hassan al-Majid?
Ali Hassan al-Majid, as secretary general
of the Northern Bureau of
Iraqs Bath Party, held authority over all agencies
of the state in the
Kurdish region from March 1987 to April 1989, including the 1st
and 5th
Corps of the army, the General Security Directorate, and Military
Intelligence. This included the period of the Anfal
genocide against
the regions Kurdish residents. One of his orders, dated
June 20, 1987,
directed army commanders to carry out random bombardments
to
kill the
largest number of persons present in
prohibited zones.
Named after a Koranic verse, justifying pillage
of properties of
infidels, the Anfal campaign unfolded as the 1980-1988
Iran/Iraq war
was winding down. The Anfal campaign, under al-Majids command,
resulted in the murder and disappearance of some
100,000
noncombatants, the use of chemical weapons against non-combatants
in
dozens of locations, and the near-total destruction of family
and
community assets, including agricultural and other infrastructure,
throughout the rural Kurdish areas. Documents captured from Iraqi
intelligence services demonstrate that the mass killings,
disappearances, forced displacement, and other crimes
were carried out
in a coherent and highly centralized manner under al-Majids
direct
supervision.
Ali Hassan al-Majid was subsequently in charge
of Iraqs military
occupation of Kuwait and led forces that suppressed the popular
uprising
in the south of the country in March 1991. All of these campaigns
were
marked by executions, arbitrary arrests, disappearances,
torture and
other atrocities.
Chemical Ali posing as a peace envoy
is like Bosnian Serb war criminal
Ratko Mladic lecturing on human rights, said Roth. He
should be
received by prison guards, not heads of state. According
to Iraqi opposition activists and refugee testimony, al-Majid
also played a leading role in the campaign against Iraqs
Marsh Arab population in the 1990s, a campaign that included
the systematic bombardment of villages, torture, disappearances,
forced displacement, which reduced a community that once numbered
over a quarter of a million people to less than 40,000 today.
Chemical Ali in his own Words
According to a 1988 audiotape of a meeting
of leading Iraqi officials
published by Human Rights Watch, al-Majid vowed to use chemical
weapons
against the Kurds, saying:
I will kill them all with chemical weapons!
Who is going to say
anything? The international community? Fuck them! the international
community, and those who listen to them!
I will not attack them with chemicals
just one day, but I will continue
to attack them with chemicals for fifteen days.
The Legal Basis for a Prosecution
According to the United Nations Convention
against Torture and Other
Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, to which
Egypt, Jordan and Lebanon are state parties, these government
are under an international legal obligation to prosecute -- or
to extradite for prosecution -- persons on
its territory accused of torture, no matter where the torture
was
committed. Similarly, under the United Nations Convention on
the
Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, which Egypt,
Jordan,
Lebanon and Syria have ratified, these governments undertook
to prevent
and to punish acts of genocide. Finally, all four countries have
ratified the Geneva Conventions, which prescribes that states
parties
must search for persons alleged to have committed war crimes,
and bring
such persons, regardless of their nationality, before their own
courts.(keralamonitor.com)
India: Break the cycle of
impunity and torture in Punjab
19 January 2003
"Torture and custodial violence continue
to take place in Punjab, despite the end of the militancy period
in the mid-1990s", Amnesty International said today in a
new report on torture in the Indian state. Torture in Punjab
persists as a result of the continuing culture of impunity developed
within the criminal justice system in the state during the militancy
period. "Unless this trend is reversed and the procedures
and attitudes which facilitated abuses during that period are
dismantled, custodial violence will continue to take place in
the state", the human rights organization said.
In the new report, "India: Break the
cycle of impunity and torture in Punjab", Amnesty International
shows that impunity for past abuses and the continuation of torture
today are causally linked. "There is an urgent need to break
this cycle and the recommendations contained at the end of the
report are made as a contribution towards this objective",
the human rights organization said.
Armed opposition ended in Punjab a decade
ago, resulting in a marked decrease of human rights violations
in the state. However, thousands of families are still waiting
to know the fate of their relatives who "disappeared"
during that period. "Until justice and truth is delivered
to these families, the wounds left by the militancy period will
remain open," Amnesty International added.
Only a small minority of the police officers
responsible for a range of human rights violations - including
torture, deaths in custody, extra-judicial executions and "disappearances"
during the militancy period -- have been brought to justice.
This has led some state officials to believe that they can violate
people's fundamental rights with impunity even today. Some police
in Punjab often use torture as a substitute for proper investigations,
to extort money or for personal motives. Workload, lack of resources,
intimidation or disinterest facilitate the recourse to custodial
violence. "Victims of torture today are most often those
who are socially and economically disadvantaged, including women,
dalits and the poorer sections of the community. Human rights
activists are often victims of harassment and ill treatment,"
the organization explained.
"Action is rarely taken against the perpetrators
due to the tolerance of other elements of the criminal justice
system, such as public prosecutors, the courts, the legal aid
system and the doctors", Amnesty International continued.
The Punjab Human Rights Commission has so
far not been given the powers, resources or institutional autonomy
to function effectively as a check on torture and ill-treatment
in the state.
Punjab today should serve as a warning to
states in India presently effected by armed conflicts, such as
Jammu and Kashmir and states in the northeast: perpetrators of
human rights violations must be held to account in situations
of widespread and prolonged violence, if long-term repercussions
for the enjoyment of human rights are to be avoided after the
end the conflicts.
The report is part of Amnesty International's
global Campaign Against Torture. During this campaign the organization
has expressed concerns about the use of torture in other Indian
states, such as West Bengal, Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan, as
well as in a wide range of countries, including Brazil, China,
Pakistan, the Russian Federation and the USA.
The decade of violent political opposition
in Punjab -- which lasted from the mid-1980s to the mid-1990s
-- started when a movement within the Sikh community in Punjab
turned to violence to achieve an independent state for the Sikhs.
During that period armed opposition groups targeted and killed
police officers, elected representatives and civil servants.
The security forces resorted to unlawful and indiscriminate arrests,
torture and extrajudicial executions. Thousands of civilians
were the victims of the violence on both sides.(keralamonitor.com)
Malaysia: Restriction of freedom
of expression hits the Internet
20 January 2003
The police investigation of the independent
internet news site, Malaysiakini, under the Sedition Act calls
into question the pledge by Malaysian authorities not to censor
the internet, Amnesty International said today. "This demonstrates,
yet again, how restrictive laws are used to curtail freedom of
expression in Malaysia," the organization added. The police
raided the Malaysiakini office on Monday, confiscating all nineteen
of their computers, effectively preventing the site's publication.
The raid came following a complaint alleging that a letter published
on the site was seditious. The complaint was made by youth wing
of the United Malay National Organization (UMNO), the largest
party in the government coalition.
Part of the complaint reportedly refers to
the letter's questioning of affirmative action for Malays. The
'special position' of Malays and indigenous peoples is enshrined
in the Malaysian Constitution. These provisions include preferential
treatment in many aspects of life, including education and work.
"The investigation of Malaysiakini makes
the government's pledge not to censor the internet sound hollow.
Laws like the Sedition Act, that fail to conform to international
human rights standards, threaten the survival of an independent
media and freedom of expression in Malaysia," Amnesty International
said. Malaysia's restrictive laws are routinely used to curtail
internationally recognized human rights, such as freedom of expression.
Efforts by independent domestic and international media sources,
as well as opposition politicians and Malaysian non-government
organizations to comment on sensitive social issues, run the
risk of fines, prosecution and imprisonment.
"It is time that the Malaysian government
stopped eroding human rights in the name of stability and development.
Real stability and development can only be achieved through guaranteeing
the free expression of views on emerging social and economic
problems, and protecting other fundamental human rights,"
Amnesty International concluded.
Background
In its efforts to promote Malaysia as a centre
for Information Technology, the government has until recently
restrained itself from using its array of restrictive laws in
regard to the Internet. Under Section 3 of the Communications
and Multimedia Act, the government prohibited the censorship
of the Internet, although there are provisions to act against
"defamatory and false information". However, recent
events may signal an end to this restraint.
The Sedition Act (1948) places wide limitations
on freedom of expression, particularly regarding sensitive political
subjects such as race. Under Section 4(1) c of the Act anyone
responsible for a "seditious publication" is liable
to a fine not exceeding RM5000 or up to three years imprisonment.
Sedition itself is broadly defined in Section 3(1) e as "to
promote feelings of ill-will and hostility between races or classes
of the population of Malaysia."(keralamonitor.com)