My son is facing a serious
threat to his life in the Gulf
*By Ajaya Kumar
Thiruvananthapuram: December
31, 2000: Damodaran and Saraswathy Amma are really worried about
the fate of their 33 year old son, Damodaran Sasikumar, who has
been in the Gulf facing a serious threat to his life from his
Arab sponsor. This old couple residing at Kunnu Vila Veedu, Payattuvila
near Thiruvananthapuram in Kerala say that the sponsor, an Arab
policeman working in the Royal Oman Police, threatened to kill
their son and treat the death as a simple accident or suicide!

Last August their son Shashikumar
was put behind the bars for about two weeks on the basis of some
false allegations made by the "the influencial Arab sponsor."
Virtually Shashikumar has been living a hide and seek game for
the last six months trying to save his life from the sponsor
and his gang who have been after his blood. "My sponsor
and his gang are trying to kill me," his son said in a complaint
to the Indian Ambassador, Muscat. Is this incident a clear indication
towards the large number of mysterious deaths of Indians in the
Gulf region?
Damodaran told Kerlamontior that
that his son is left with no money or resources to fight a protracted
legal battle in an alien land. On one occasion, the sponsor and
a group of Arabs forcefully made their son sign blank papers
to make false records showing that all the claims are settled.
Besides snatching away his partnership business which was prospering,
they have also taken possession of two cars, mobile phone and
the construction material. Now Shashikumar wants to get back
at least his car, phone, salary arrears for several months and
compensation for putting him in jail without any valid reason.
I will fight it
out...Shashikumar Damodaran
Shashikumar had been running
a small construction business in the Gulf country under the sponsorship
of the Arab policeman-a common practice among ordinary Arabs.
According to Damodaran, Shasikumar went to Oman about in 1992
and four years back started a small construction contract business
under the sponsorship of Samir Muftah Juma Al Salmi, Mahboob
Trading Company at Sumail. This is the normal practice followed
by Indian businessmen to start small and medium scale business
with the help of an Arab sponsor, who will be a "sleeping
partner". The sponsor gets a regular monthly payment in
return for his sponsorship.
Shashikumar represents hundreds
of small and medium scale businesses run by Indians, especially
Keralites, in this manner. The business which Shashikumar started
at a very small scale improved to such an extent that the company
was implementing a number of construction projects. According
to Shashikumar's parents, the sponsor suddenly changed his attitude
when more money started coming in from the business.
According to a complaint made
by Shashikumar to the Indian Prime Minister's Office his sponsor
has publicly threatened to kill him. "I have been working
under the sponsorhip of Mr. Samir Muftah Jammera Al Salni, Jabal
Al Mahboob Trading PO Box 470, PIN 620, Sumail for more than
four years. I have been working as full in charge of the company
. Now a days I am facing severe harassment from my sponsor who
is working in the Royal Oman Police," says the complaint
dated August 28, 2000. A copy of the complaint, written in broken
English, was sent to the Kerala Chief Minister E.K Nayanar also.
"I am desired to acknowledge the receipt of your letter
received in this office and to inform that it is being forwarded
to the Foreign Secretary, Ministry of External Affairs New Delhi
for action as appropriate." Said Rohit Khera, Officer on
Special Duty in a letter from the Prime Ministers Office. Similarly,
K.K. Suresh Babu, Deputy Secretary of Non Resident Keralites
Affairs Department has also forwarded a copy of the memorandum
to the Ambassador and MoE for appropriate action.
Now another memorandum is being
forwarded to the Member of Parliament, Thiruvananthapuram. "I
am very sorry to inform you that my sponsor has declared in public
that he will kill me with his lorry and will try to make the
result of (police) investigation in such a manner that the killing
will be reported either as an accident or a suicide," the
complaint to Atal Behari Vajpayee added. Because of this open
death knell from a local Police official, Sashikumar sought asylum
in the Indian Embassy in Muscat-the last resort for any Indians
facing any crisis situation. The embassy asked him to file a
case.
"With reference to your
complaint dated 14.08.2000 against your sponsor M/s. Jabal Al
Mahboob Trading, PO Box 470, Sumail
regarding non payment
of salary, service benefits and repatriation, you are advised
to approach the NEAREST Labour Court to register complaint against
your sponsor," says an official letter signed by T.R. Meena,
Labour Attache, Indian Embassy Muscat. Following this, Shashikumar
made a complaint to the Labour Court in Sumail. "I have
filed a petition in the Sumail Labour Court. But I am very afraid
to appear before the Labour Court," says Shashikumar's complaint
to the Indian Prime Minister.
According to Shashikumar's father,
the indifferent attitude of the Indian Embassy is another bitter
experience faced by his son. The embassy officials who are supposed
to help an ordinary businessmen during such crisis situation
have willy nilly helped the sponsor to put him in prison for
two weeks. " One of the staff of the Indian Embassy, Mr.
Abdul Rahman is the eye witness of this harassment. On 6 November
2000 Abdul Rahman representing the Indian Embassy escorted my
son to the Sumail Police Station to register a complaint to get
back his car and mobile phone from the sponsor. But instead of
recovering these items, his son was also kept in prison for two
weeks. Instead of helping him, the embassy official just escorted
him to the prison," says a terribly upset Damodaran. "My
son was not presented before any court or given any charge sheet
for theft, as alleged by the sponsor clearly showing that the
charges were baseless," added Damodaran. No all Indian and
Malayali businessmen in the Gulf are saints -they also do some
dubious deals here and there. In this case, Shashikumar's parents
say that their son is not involved in any such deals.
He managed to get out of the
prison and continue the fight with the help of a few Malayali
friends who are currently giving him food, accommodation and
moral support. "I did not get salary from May till today.
I did not get the leave salary and ticket during the last four
years," Shashikumar said in a complaint to the Ambassador,
requesting him to take necessary steps for recovering his car,
GSM and arrears from the sponsor. He has also demanded that the
case be transferred from Sumail Labour Court to Muscat Labour
Court or the Commercial Court in Muscat.
The event shows the scant regard
and respect shown by powerful Arabs towards the Indian Embassy
-which is representing the soverign, democratice republic of
India. According to the advise given by Indian embassy offcials
to Shashikumar, if an Indian is working in the Arab country,
all such bad treatment is expected. Does it mean that the Indian
embassy also endorses the ill treatment of Indians by their overseas
employers?

In the company of Big Business: Indian Ambassador in the company of the biggest
Malayali businessman--Chairman of Dubai based Lulu Shopping Cente
and MK Group of companies -- the biggest expatriate investor
in the GCC region.
According to information available
here, Sasiumar was imprisoned for 12 days by the Royal Oman Police
on the basis of false allegations made by his sponsor. It is
said that by making false allegations of theft, robbery
or other crimes against Indians, the Arab sponsors can
easily put an Indian behind the bars. The legal and judicial
system in the Arab countries is such that even the innocent expatriate
victims will not be able to prove their innocence without proper
legal assistance.
Despite severe problems faced
from the powerful Arab sponsor, his 33 year old son has been
firm in his determination to fight against the false allegations
and to recover at least part of the business that he established
over the last four years and other payment arrears. Even though
the Prime Ministers Office and the Kerala Chief Ministers office
have written to the Indian embassy in response to the complaints
made by Shashikumar, the Indian Ambassador in Muscat seems to
be reluctant to meet this poor man who lost everything that he
earned in the last four years. Even after repeated efforts to
meet the Indian Ambassador personally, he was denied access by
the embassy staff. The old parents are eagerly waiting for the
safe return of their dear son. Now Shashikumar is scared even
to go to the Indian embassy, thinking that he will be sent to
jail again. His fear is that next time he will never be
able to come out and meet his old parents. After Shashikumar
showed some guts to make a formal complaint to the Indian Prime
Minister, the embassy officials are also said to be more furious.
It may be noted that there are
number of cases where Malayali families have complained about
missing sons and relatives in the Gulf region. The case of Shashi
Kumar is not an isolated event in the Gulf. According to a Gulf
returned Malayali, a major chunk of his saving was lost in a
hotel project which was taken away by the Arab sponsor just one
day before the inauguration! A property developed by two Malayali
businessmen with a local partner was usurped forcibly by the
sponsor. The Malayali businessmen had to no other option but
to leave empty handed- that also with the support of embassy
officials. If this is happening at the grass root level, what
is the guarantee for billions of Indain money invested in major
projects in the Gulf countries.


Hundreds of such small shops
in the Gulf are run by Malayalis
There are thousands of small
and medium sized business establishments registered with various
ministries in the Gulf region. Expatriates manage and operate
these firms through disguised trade. According to a recent estimate
made by the Emirates Center for Strategic Studies and Research,
Abu Dhabi, there are more than 33,000 establishments with a capital
of less than Omani Rial 5,000 and Omani Rial 10,000 (Five lakh
to 11 lakh Indian rupees) registered in Oman. According to the
study thousands of such small business establishment are run
by expatriate businessmen, especially Indians and Malayalis under
the sponsorship scheme. In many cases, the involvement of Arab
partners is to get a share of the profit made by businesses run
by expatriates. According to rules, foreigners are not allowed
to have legal right over property or assets in the GCC. It is
high time that the authorities realise the importance of the
problem.
CRISIL
Reports:
Cent Bank
Home Finance Limited Fixed Deposit Programme
Bobay January 5, 2001: The "FA" (pronounced 'FA') rating
assigned to the fixed deposit programme of Cent Bank Home Finance
Limited (CBHFL) has been upgraded to "FA+" (pronounced
'FA plus'). The upgrade reflects improvement in asset quality
following settlements arrived at with Karnataka Housing Board,
a major overdue account, and some private builders, improvement
in the profitability and continued strong support from the parent,
Central Bank of India. These factors are partially offset by
increasing competition, the high gearing, continuing exposure
to private builders, albeit limited and the moderate size of
the company.m
Cent Bank
Home Finance Limited (CBHF), a 51% subsidiary of Central Bank
of India (CBI), is in the business of providing finance for the
construction and purchase of residential houses. The balance
49% of the company's equity is held by HUDCO (17%), NHB (16%)
and UTI (16%). The company with its registered office located
in Bhopal, disburses loans to individuals as well as private
and public bodies and had an outstanding loan portfolio of Rs.164.6
cr. as on March 31, 2000 and reported a net profit of Rs.47.1
mn. on a total income of Rs.242.4 mn.
JP
Morgan Securities (India) Private Limited
Rs. 1
Billion Short Term Debt Programme
The 'P1+'
(pronounced P one plus) rating assigned to the Rs. 1 billion
Short Term debt Programme of JP Morgan Securities (India) Private
Limited (JPMSI) has been reaffirmed.The rating reflects the strong
parentage, well-defined risk management systems and strong liquidity
position of the company. The rating is constrained by the moderate
capitalisation and the inherent risks in fixed income securities
trading business in terms of susceptibility to interest rate
movements.JPMSI is one of the sixteen RBI approved primary dealers
(PDs) operating in the country. The company had a net worth of
Rs. 1151.30 million as at March 31, 2000 and reported a PAT of
Rs. 307.84 million for the year ended March 31, 2000.
NATIONAL
THERMAL POWER CORPORATION LIMITED
Rs. 1.33
Billion Bonds Issue AAA(Reaffirmed)
Rs. 0.54 Billion Bonds Issue AAA(Reaffirmed)
Fixed Deposit Programme FAAA(Reaffirmed)
Rs. 2.5 Billion Commercial Paper Programme P1+(Reaffirmed)
January
5, 2001: The 'AAA' (pronounced 'triple A') rating assigned to
the Rs. 1.33 billion and Rs. 0.54 billion bond programmes of
National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd. (NTPC) has been reaffirmed.
The 'FAAA' (pronounced 'F triple A') rating assigned to the fixed
deposit programme of NTPC has been reaffirmed. The 'P1+' (pronounced
'P one plus') rating assigned to the Rs.2.5 billion commercial
paper programme of NTPC has been reaffirmed.
The ratings
reflect the dominant position of NTPC in the domestic power generation
industry that is characterised by low demand risk, the company's
track record of efficient operations and its competitive cost
structure. The sound financial profile of the company as reflected
in the high level of margins, comfortable and improving gearing
and interest coverage ratios and stable cash flows from operations,
has also been factored. These strengths are partly offset by
the high and increasing level of debtors on account of the weak
financial position of State Electricity Boards (SEB), and the
tightening of tariff norms by The Central Electricity Regulatory
Commission (CERC).
NTPC,
a 100% Government of India (GoI) owned company is engaged in
the business of establishing and operating thermal power stations
and selling power to SEBs. The company had an installed capacity
of 19291 MW as at March 31, 2000. For the year ended March 31,
2000, the company had operating income and net profit of Rs.160.91
billion and Rs.34.25 billion, respectively.
Thermax
Limited
Rs. 350
mn. Commercial Paper Programme P1+ (Reaffirmed)
The "P1+"
(pronounced P one plus) rating assigned to the Rs. 350 Million
Commercial Paper Programme of Thermax Limited (Themax) has been
reaffirmed.The rating takes into account the strong market position
of Thermax in its product segments, a large product mix and a
strong financial profile characterised by fairly large networth,
low gearing and strong liquidity position. These factors are
partially offset by the sluggish performance of the capital goods
sector, and its impact on the company's turnover and profitability.
Thermax's
business portfolio has traditionally been divided into three
segments - energy, environment & chemicals. The company has
recently undergone a restructuring exercise whereby the overall
business of the company has been realigned. The entire restructuring
exercise has been based on the recommendations of Boston Consulting
Group (BCG). The company has identified four focus areas - boiler
and heating systems, absorption cooling, water and waste management,
and chemicals. The company has decided to exit out of businesses,
which do not have synergies with the identified core areas. Hence,
Thermax exited out of Thermax Systems and Software Ltd, which
it sold to Global Tele Systems in an all share swap, and sold
its industrial fans division to Universal Fans. The company also
closed down Thermax Fuji Electric Ltd., a joint venture between
Thermax and Fuji Electric of Japan, involved in the manufacture
of electrical equipment like transmitters, controllers, recorders,
flowmeters, etc. Apart from business restructuring, the company
also undertook a management restructuring. The board of Thermax
at present constitutes non - executive directors, who will not
be directly involved in the day to day operations of the company.For
the year 1999-00, Thermax reported a net turnover of Rs. 3820
million and a profit after tax of Rs. 323 million.
Thermax
Culligan Water Technology Limited
Rs. 40
Million Non-Convertible Debenture Issue AA- (so) (Reaffirmed)
The "AA-(so)"
(pronounced "double A minus structured obligation")
rating assigned to the Rs. 40 million Non-convertible Debenture
issue of Thermax Culligan Water Technology Ltd. (TCW) has been
reaffirmed. The instrument is guaranteed by Thermax Limited (Thermax).TCW
currently has a weak financial position as reflected in its negative
networth as on March 2000. For the year ended March 2000, the
company reported a gross turnover of Rs. 233 million and a loss
of Rs. 78.4 million. The rating is however solely based on the
unconditional and irrevocable guarantee extended by Thermax to
be executed in favour of the investors. The scope of the guarantee
covers servicing of all interest payment and principal repayment
obligations of the rated debt.
Credit
Enhancement:
The credit enhancement mechanism specified by CRISIL, to ensure
timely servicing of obligations under the rated instruments,
comprises execution of Guarantee Agreement by the Guarantor (Thermax)
in favour of the debenture-holders. TCW is required to service
its obligations to the debenture -holders on Trigger Dates (Three
days prior to the applicable "due dates"). In the event
of failure of TCW to honour its obligation on the Trigger Dates,
the investors are entitled to invoke the guarantee to ensure
timely payment w.r.t. the debt service obligations.
Samsung
India Electronics Limited
Rs. 500
Million Commercial Paper Programme P1+ (Enhanced from Rs 250
Million)
A "P1+"
(pronounced 'P one plus') rating has been assigned to the Rs.
500 Million (Mn) Commercial Paper Programme of Samsung India
Electronics Limited (SIEL) (Enhanced from Rs 250 Mn).The rating
reflects the company's comfortable & improving business position
in the highly competitive consumer electronics market established
within a relatively short span time. The company has achieved
a considerable success in establishing its brand name in the
Indian market through aggressive advertising and marketing push
coupled with its innovative & technologically advanced product
offerings. The rating also factors SIEL's favourable financial
risk profile as reflected by its strong growth in operating income,
comfortable accruals and capital structure, strong cash-flow
protection measures and its favourable working capital management
& liquidity position. The rating also reflects the company's
strong relationship with its parent- Samsung Electronics Company
(Rated "BBB-" by Standard & Poor's).
Samsung
India Electronics Limited (SIEL) was incorporated in August 1995
as a JV between Samsung Electronics Company (SEC), South Korea
and an Indian partner. SIEL is engaged in the manufacturing and
sale of consumer electronics items and home appliances. Starting
with the launch of Colour Televisions (CTVs) in the North Indian
markets in December 1995, SIEL has aggressively expanded its
product range over the years to include Microwave Ovens (MWOs),
Refrigerators, Washing machines, Air Conditioners, DVDs and VCDs.
SIEL's turnover has grown rapidly, assisted by the favourable
growth in the CTV market and stable growth rates in the refrigerator
segment, over the past few years. For the year ended December
1999, the company reported an operating income of Rs. 6530.0
Million and a profit after tax of Rs.269.3 Mn.
Atlas
Cycle Industries Limited
Rs. 165
Million Non Convertible Debenture Issue A+ Reaffirmed
January
4, 2001
The reaffirmation
in Atlas's rating is on account of the company's leading position
in the Indian cycle industry and a conservative financial risk
profile. While Atlas is relatively less profitable than the other
major cycle companies, the company has a strong brand and a large
dealer network in a consolidated industry with fairly strong
entry barriers. The rating also factors in the company's leveraging
remaining at current levels and flat sales and profits in the
2000-01.Atlas was set up in 1951 to manufacture bicycles and
at present has three manufacturing locations with a total capacity
of 33.40 lakh cycles. For the half year ended Sept 30, 2000 Atlas
made a profit of Rs.41.3 Mn (Rs.40 Mn in FH 1999-00) on sales
of Rs. 1840 Mn.
Hero
Cycles Limited
Rs. 200
Million Non Convertible Debenture Programme AA+ Reaffirmed
Rs. 400 Million Commercial Paper Programme P1+ Reaffirmed
The "AA+"
(pronounced 'double A plus') rating assigned to the Rs 200 million
Non Convertible Debenture Programme of Hero Cycles Limited (HCL)
has been reaffirmed. The "P1+" (pronounced 'P one plus')
rating assigned to the Rs 400 million Commercial Paper Programme
of the company has also been Reaffirmed.
HCL's
rating reflects its dominant position in Indian cycle industry
coupled with its management's demonstrated ability to sustain
market share and the strength derived from being the most profitable
cycle manufacturer. The rating also factors in the company's
favourable financial risk profile characterised by stable gearing
and high debt protection ratios which is expected to remain comfortable
in the absence of any major capital expenditure/ investment programs.
However the ratings are to an extent constrained by the low growth
and margins in the bicycle business, competitive environment
for the CR division and the support extended to other companies
in the Hero Group.
Hero Cycles
Limited is a part of the 3,800 crore Hero group which includes
Hero Honda (FAAA), Munjal Showa (P1+), Highway Cycle Industries,
Gujarat Cycles & Majestic Auto. HCL has bicycle manufacturing
facilities at Ludhiana and Sahibabad (UP) with installed capacities
of 36 lakh bicycles and 9 lakh bicycles p.a. respectively. HCL
also has a cold rolling mill at Ludhiana with an installed capacity
of 110,000 tpa. For the year ended March 31st, 2000 HCL posted
a profit after tax of Rs 421 Million on a sales of Rs 8.2 Billion.
January
4, 2001
Indian
Farmers Fertiliser Cooperative Limited (IFFCO)
Rs. 4
billion Bonds Programme AA (Enhanced from Rs. 2 billion)
A "AA"
(pronounced 'double A') rating has been assigned to the Rs 4
billion Non Convertible Bonds Programme (enhanced from Rs. 2
billion) of Indian Farmers Fertiliser Cooperative Limited (IFFCO).
The rating reflects IFFCO's strong position in both the nitrogenous
and non-nitrogenous fertiliser industry, comfortable business
position of its urea operations, large sized operations (in terms
of revenues and cash flows) and the relatively new facilities
which provide the company with strong operating efficiencies.
The rating also favourably takes into account the strong support
base existing in the country for agriculture and the regulatory
support in terms of markets and assured returns to urea manufacturers.
However, uncertainty pertaining to continuation of this regulatory
support, in the present form, in the future is a constraining
factor. The rating is also constrained by low operating margins
of IFFCO's complex fertiliser division due to various extraneous
factors, increase in inventory (and competition) in recent years
and vulnerability of the fertiliser business to monsoons.
IFFCO, set-up as a co-operative society, is the largest fertiliser
manufacturer in the country. It is engaged in the manufacture
of urea as well as complex fertilisers at four locations in Uttar
Pradesh and Gujarat. It reported a PAT of 1400.5 million (unaudited)
on sales of Rs. 25735.0 million (unaudited), after taking into
account the effect of interim reassessment of capacity of its
urea plants, for the half year period April-September 2000.
January
4, 2001
Reckitt
Benckiser (India) Limited
Rs. 150
Million Non-Convertible Debenture Issue AAA (Re-affirmed)
Rs. 250 Million Commercial Paper Programme P1+ (Re-affirmed)
The 'AAA'
(pronounced 'triple A') rating assigned to Rs. 150 million Non
Convertible Debenture issue of Reckitt Benckiser (India) Limited
(RBIL) (erstwhile Reckitt & Colman of India Ltd) has been
reaffirmed. The 'P1+' (pronounced 'P one plus') rating assigned
to Rs. 250 million Commercial Paper Programme of RBIL has also
been reaffirmed.
The ratings
continue to reflect RBIL's continued leadership position in the
various niche segments in household and over-the-counter (OTC)
pharmaceutical product categories, its strong brand franchises
with good pricing flexibility, well established distribution
network and the company's favourable financial risk profile as
reflected by its above average profitability, conservative financial
policy and favourable cash-flow protection measures. These factors
are, somewhat, tempered by the company's narrow product diversity
and its vulnerability to competition in the household products
category. The ratings also factor the support to RBIL's from
its parent, Reckitt Benckiser Plc. (rated "A/Stable/A-1"
by Standard & Poor's) in terms of access to brands, product
formulations and marketing support.
RBIL,
a 51% subsidiary of Reckitt Benckiser Plc. (RBP), is engaged
in the manufacture and marketing of household products and OTC
pharmaceutical products. While the household products segment
comprises of products in fabric care, shoe care, surface care,
insecticides and toilet care range, the OTC product segment consists
of the 'Dettol' range (soap, liquid soap, antiseptic and shaving
gel) and pharmaceutical products such as 'Disprin' and 'Colsprin'.
The company reported a net profit of Rs. 140.24 million (Mn)
on a net sales of Rs 4735.5 Mn for the year ending December 31,
1999, it reported a net profit of Rs. 209.1 Mn on a net sales
of Rs 4274.8 Mn during the first nine-months of FY 2000.
During
1999, RBIL's erstwhile parent, Reckitt Colman Plc. had merged
globally with Benckiser NV, Netherlands to create Reckitt Benckiser
Plc, which is one of the leading players in the global house-hold
cleaning product market, with leading brands in the various niche
categories. Inline with the change in the parentage, the name
of the Indian entity has also been changed to Reckitt Benckiser
(India) Ltd from Reckitt & Coleman of India Ltd. The global
merger is not only expected to add significantly to the RBIL's
product portfolio, but also introduce more focus on cost rationalisation,
inline with erstwhile Benckiser's philosophy, thus helping the
Indian entity in its future growth and improving its cost structure.
January
4, 2001
Sanghi
Industries Limited
Rs. 120
Million Non-Convertible Debentures AAA (so)
(Backed by an unconditional and irrevocable guarantee from Power
Finance Corporation Ltd.)
A 'AAA
(so)' (pronounced 'triple A structured obligation') rating has
been assigned to the proposed Rs. 120 million non-convertible
debenture issue of Sanghi Industries Limited (SIL). The rating
is based solely on the strength of an unconditional and irrevocable
guarantee from Power Finance Corporation Limited (PFC) for an
amount equal to the principal repayment and interest payment
obligations on the debentures. The rating is also supported by
a credit enhancement mechanism and a payment structure to ensure
timely payment of debt obligations on the rated debentures. The
rating reflects the credit strength of PFC, which has an outstanding
long-term rating of 'AAA' (pronounced 'triple A') from CRISIL.
The 'AAA' rating of PFC reflects its dominant position as a lender
in the power sector, the support available from the Government
of India due to its important policy role in the development
of the country's power sector, the high level of capitalisation
and healthy profitability. However, the rating sensitivities
include dependence on a single sector, deteriorating financial
position of majority of its customers - the state electricity
boards (SEBs) and increasing exposure to foreign currency risk.
The salient
features of the credit enhancement mechanism are:
·
SIL is required to transfer an amount equivalent to the forthcoming
interest payment and/ or principal redemption obligations on
the rated debentures to the No-lien Account at least 5 business
days (Trigger Dates) before the payment becomes due (Due Dates).
The company would be required to furnish to the Trustees a certificate
from the Bank certifying that the amount has been deposited by
the company in the said No-lien Account.
·
The Trustee is required to monitor the balance in the No-lien
Account on the Trigger Dates prior to every Due Date for payment
of interest and/ or principal repayment to ensure that adequate
funds are available for servicing the financial obligations on
the rated debentures.
·
The Trustees are required to invoke the Guarantee in the event
of shortfall in the No-lien Account on the Trigger Dates (and/
or if any of the various other events of default as specified
in the Trustee Agreement happen) to ensure full and timely payment
to the debenture holders.
The above
rating would become valid only upon completion of the Guarantee
Agreement, No-lien Account Agreement, the Debenture Trustee Agreement,
and other documentation to the satisfaction of CRISIL. The role
of Trustees forms an important and critical link to ensure the
desired performance of the credit enhancement mechanism.
SIL is
engaged in the manufacture and sale of PVC foam, rigid PVC films,
adhesive tapes, pressure sensitive BOPP tapes and electrical
insulation tapes. The company is setting up a 2.6 MT per annum
(tpa) capacity cement plant at Kutch (in Gujarat) along with
the associated infrastructural facilities like captive power
plant, captive all-weather jetty and water desalination plant.
The above debenture issue is proposed to fund the 45 MW captive
power plant. The total project cost, which is currently estimated
at around Rs. 11.9 billion, has increased significantly from
the original cost estimates of around Rs. 6.6 billion in mid-1990s
due to delay in implementation. Most of the increase in project
cost has been funded through additional loans and preference
shares. The project is being financed at a debt-equity ratio
of around 6.3 times. SIL has already spent around Rs. 862 crore
on the project till date. The entire balance debt funding of
Rs. 257 core has been tied-up from various banks and institutions.
As per the revised estimates, the clinker project is expected
to be commissioned by April 2001 and the cement plant by around
July 2001. Any further delay in the implementation may lead to
further increase in the project cost.
For the
year ended 30 Sept. 2000, SIL made a profit of Rs. 1.77 crores
on net sales of Rs. 81.74 crores.
January
4, 2001
COPE BACKS
PACKTECH INTERNATIONAL MID EAST GROW
Dubai:
The UK-headquartered Confederation of Organisers of Packaging
Exhibitions (COPE) has accepted the PackTech International show
in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, as a new member, ensuring the
event, to be next held in January 2003, gains widespread global
exposure.
Membership
of COPE means the Dubai show will now be marketed at major packaging
industry events around the world.Though PackTech International
has previously been staged in conjunction with printing and plastics
shows, the organisers, Fairs and Exhibitions, say it will now
be a dedicated vertical event reflecting region-wide growth in
the packaging sector. PrinTech International will run simultaneously
in an adjacent hall.
"We
are re-launching the show into a vertical B2B packaging exhibition
- PackTech International," explained Clive Richardson, Chief
Executive, Fairs and Exhibitions, which organises the show. "Whilst
the show has generated useful growth over the five years of its
existence, it has not grown in line with the development of the
industry serving the wide Middle East, where per annum growth
figures of 30% are now being quoted.
"With
COPE's support and a stronger emphasis on packaging, speedier
growth is possible."Last September, PackTech 2000 attracted
almost 5,000 visitors from 44 countries.
"What
was particularly significant was the spread of the visitor base,"
said Clive Richardson, Chief Executive, Fairs and Exhibitions,
which organises the show. "Though 75% of the visitors came
from within the six GCC states of Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Saudi
Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, there were healthy
showings from the wider Middle East, most notably Iran, North
Africa, the Levant and Indian Sub-continent."
Almost
half the visitors represented companies with 50 or more employees
and more than half specialised in the packaging and bottling
sectors. "Close to 2,000 visitors said they had purchasing
authority of over US $100,000, with nearly 900 having authority
to spend upwards of US $500,000," said Richardson.Declared
on-site sales amounted to US $3 million with exhibitors expecting
to quadruple business generated in follow-through orders.
"Overall
exhibitor satisfaction as shown through an on-site pool, was
very high," said Val Don, Project Manager, Fairs and Exhibitions.
"Exhibitors particularly commented on the high quality of
visitors and their overall intention of discussing genuine business
at the show.Exhibitors from 29 countries participated in the
exhibition, which featured a 28-strong group delegation from
Taiwan, industry pavilions from Iran, Italy and France as well
as first-time exhibitors from both Latvia and Russia.
*Ajaya
Kumar is in the Keralamonitor.com team of reporters
Photographs by Iqbal Hameed